Concrete jet printers

Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/01/concrete_building_printers/

Most readers will be aware of so-called "3D printing" techniques, in which solid objects can be constructed automatically from computer models. Researchers in California intend to scale the process up radically, using "contour crafting" concrete extrusion to erect buildings in a matter of hours.

"Instead of plastic, Contour Crafting will use concrete," says Behrokh Khoshnevis of the University of Southern California. Khoshnevis and his colleagues have just announced funding for their efforts from Caterpillar, the construction-equipment globocorp.

What do you mean, the picture was back to front?

Contour Crafting equipment, apparently, can already create a six-foot concrete wall without any human input. It does this by putting down smooth, neatly-trimmed layers of concrete one on top of another "in a process analogous to inkjet printing". Rather than ink, however, the heads on this equipment dispense "concrete, clay or adobe", which is smoothed as it goes along using an array of trowel attachments. The gear was designed at the USC Center for Rapid Automated Fabrication Technologies (CRAFT), which has lofty goals indeed:
The overarching vision... is to develop the science and engineering needed for rapid automated fabrication of objects of various size up to mega-scale structures such as boats, industrial objects, public art and whole building structures.

The grand challenge for CRAFT is building a custom-designed house in a day while drastically reducing the costs, injuries, waste and environmental impact associated with traditional construction... whether it be to provide affordable housing... extraterrestrial buildings constructed from in situ materials... [or] curved organic designs rather than straight surfaces...

The USC boffins reckon their robo-gantry gear can do more than just concrete boxes: it can apparently fit the plumbing and electrics as it goes along, do the plastering, and perhaps even fit some structural members. And there's no need for boring old boxy shapes, either. The equipment can happily create domes, vaults or any other shape that can be drawn in CAD software and support its own weight - at no added expense. Normally, anything other than right angles and verticals costs like crazy, so this latter feature is thought to have architects salivating.

As far as more normal buildings go, the USC constructioneers believe that it will be possible for an automated setup to erect a 2,000-square-foot, two storey house in 24 hours for about one-fifth of what such a project would normally cost.

Khoshnevis and his chums are chuffed to announce their new partnership with Caterpillar. They also say that NASA is interested in using their gear for building bases on the Moon or Mars, without astronauts having to loosen their spacesuit trousers and heave hods of bricks about. Other private and government organisations are involved, including the US Army Corps of Engineers and building-materials firm USG.

Read more from USC here. ®

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:22 am

curious and skeptical.

so they are comparing making a prefab slab to a whole building? if so the pre fab is done in a factory and trucked to site.
how will they transport a building?
or if done on site, imagine the variables in curing etc? even win an particles could leave it looking odd...
be interesting.. i hate concretors as a rule, but this will jus mean more people out of work if it does work.

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Location: Newy

what a PITA to clean the printer head when it gets clogged

Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia

Pyrotech wrote:

what a PITA to clean the printer head when it gets clogged

Just pick up a set of new cartridges from officeworks
Wink

Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Location: Central Coast, NSW

interesting thoughts on where the reo would go in it, perhaps it would lay a fiberglass type matting with the mud ?

Joined: 25 Oct 2003 Location: Melbourne Australia

I can only assume this is more of an experiment for proof of some concepts, rather than a serious commercial proposition.

It is hard to see how it could be more cost efficient than prefab approaches, especially if the same amount of effort went into improving the way prefab works.

But hey, good luck to them. It would be cool if it all worked. I don't worry so much about the job loss angle. The solution to that is to make sure all the people affected just get better jobs somewhere else.

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:34 am

chimpboy wrote:

I don't worry so much about the job loss angle. The solution to that is to make sure all the people affected just get better jobs somewhere else.

..or just train them to be technicians for the printer thingy.

Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Location: Central Coast, NSW

MissForby wrote:

chimpboy wrote:

I don't worry so much about the job loss angle. The solution to that is to make sure all the people affected just get better jobs somewhere else.

..or just train them to be technicians for the printer thingy.

picture Birlo smashing the shiter out of it with a sledge hammer Smile